While that is definitely a good write-up from Yammyboy, I happen to be on the other end of the spectrum. A couple of months ago, I was able to take a Raider on an extended test ride. I dropped my bike off at my dealer for an annual service, and they gave me a Raider as an overnight loaner. Don't get me wrong, I definitely love my Stryker, but while I had the Raider I did some extensive "research" on it :biggrin1:. Here's what I found:
For a bigger guy like myself (6'4" 290lbs), the Raider is a better choice.
-It has a more comfortable riding position with a longer reach to the bars and foot pegs.
-It has better low end torque to get up and go (especially riding 2-up). Keep in mind that is just how it felt to me.
-My opinion is that it corners just as good as the Stryker (this coming from someone who is almost through the stock footpegs).
-Both bikes obviously look great, but the Raider doesn't have as much plastic, and like Yammyboy said the engine looks way cooler.
I've also never been a speed demon, so the quick bottom end felt better to me.
For a bigger guy like myself (6'4" 290lbs), the Raider is a better choice.
-It has a more comfortable riding position with a longer reach to the bars and foot pegs.
-It has better low end torque to get up and go (especially riding 2-up). Keep in mind that is just how it felt to me.
-My opinion is that it corners just as good as the Stryker (this coming from someone who is almost through the stock footpegs).
-Both bikes obviously look great, but the Raider doesn't have as much plastic, and like Yammyboy said the engine looks way cooler.
I've also never been a speed demon, so the quick bottom end felt better to me.
