Joined
·
14 Posts
Im looking to upgrade my tire on my 2012 Stryker, I want to put a wider tire on my STOCK rim, what is the maximum width I can go without making any modifications to the frame or brackets? Thanks
According to federal law speedometers cannot have an error of more than 5 percent (typically expressed as plus/minus 2.5 percent relative to the actual speed). So at 60 mph this means your speedometer should read no more than 1.5 mph higher or lower than your actual speed. The Stryker seems to be on the high side of the tolerable error allowance.Typically at highway speeds it displays 5-7MPH faster than you're actually going. The larger 240 corrects the issue so everything reads accurately. Just another benefit of the 240!Does the 240 affect the speedo at all?
Thanks for the info! I think I am going to order mine today.According to federal law speedometers cannot have an error of more than 5 percent (typically expressed as plus/minus 2.5 percent relative to the actual speed). So at 60 mph this means your speedometer should read no more than 1.5 mph higher or lower than your actual speed. The Stryker seems to be on the high side of the tolerable error allowance.Typically at highway speeds it displays 5-7MPH faster than you're actually going. The larger 240 corrects the issue so everything reads accurately. Just another benefit of the 240!
Mine has about an 1/8" clearance at its closest point. I didn't have to trim anything.I just added the Avon 240 and it did require me to trim the lower belt guard nub that sticks out around the back edge. Easy enough with a dremmel or some sandpaper.
The Avon 240 has the smallest diameter of the popular 240's...so you don't run into clearance issues while lowered or riding 1upIs there a reason why everyone is going with the Avon? I was going to go Michelin commander II.
I will have to check the specs on the Michelin Commander IIThe Avon 240 has the smallest diameter of the popular 240's...so you don't run into clearance issues while lowered or riding 1up
Metzeler: 240/40R/18 = 25.8" tall
Dunlop: 240/40R/18 = 25.91" tall
Avon: 240/40R/18 = 25.5 " tall
I tried to look them up and found nothingI will have to check the specs on the Michelin Commander II
Everyone is getting double the mileage out of the Avon over the Metz plus it handles betterIs there a reason why everyone is going with the Avon? I was going to go Michelin commander II.
Yeah i've put 4k on the Avon and it still looks brand newEveryone is getting double the mileage out of the Avon over the Metz plus it handles better
250 Avon Requires trimming of the lower belt guard only. I have 1" lowered and no issues at all with 2-up riding. 250 Dunlop has had some issues with hitting taillight and subframe if lowered too far.240 requires no modification...the 250 may require trimming of the rear fender sub-frame
Not where I live. According to the bike shop down the hill where I get my tires changed the owner says Avon's are getting the same as Bridgestone. Coming in at between 2,000 and 3,000 miles. As you know I wear out tires really fast on these mountain roads up here and I am finding out that I am not unique. The word is Metzler is consistently averaging 5,000 miles pretty much every where there is harsh road conditions in the country. I can vogue for that because my Metz is just under 5k miles and is bald in the center but has tread left on the sides. Another bike up here a Road K 900 lb bike with a Dunlop that is looking to need replacing soon with 6,000+ miles on it.Everyone is getting double the mileage out of the Avon over the Metz plus it handles better
So how bout when riding 2up and the bike is not lowered just at stock height? www.motorcyclespuerstore.com has some good prices on the Metezler and Avon.I will have to check the specs on the Michelin Commander II